Brandcredible the blog

Public Relations’ Little Secret: “Frictionless CARING”

by:

There’s something interesting going on in the PR agency world, one that measurably benefits clients but is rarely openly discussed by public relations firms or the VPs of Marketing who select them.

See, there’s more to hiring a PR agency than meets the eye, and smart company execs know this. There’s something I’ll call Frictionless Caring. That is to say, clients know that some firms have baked into their culture the idea that sharing a client’s social content is as important as attracting new audiences.

Fewer firms resist this than in the past, but it wasn’t always thus. Years ago there was in fact a vigorous debate among PR firms about flogging our clients’ content across social channels. We grappled with the ethics of it all:

Should we always mention that we’re tweeting on behalf of a client? 

If our client is up for an award, would it be in poor taste if we rallied our whole agency to vote in the client’s favor? 

Are we sullying our own reputation if we give a positive review of the client without specifically mentioning they are a client?

If we comment on a client’s blog, helping to show social traction, should we add a client disclaimer?

And so on. PR agency staff meetings were the forum for spirited debate about ethics and even morality, and about how the lines of disclosure were becoming blurred by agencies who decided to push the envelope without grappling with what’s right and wrong. Making money was right, they reasoned; losing money was wrong.

Inch by inch it became clear that if agencies lend their collective social muscle to the efforts of clients – without being asked or cajoled to do so; without friction – the client will enjoy more traction and thus value our services even more. And it was true. It helped quite a bit to have five or 10 staffers retweeting or commenting about our clients’ content. It showed we cared about their success, and that we were invested in our relationship and found value in their respective content generation efforts.

Fast forward to today. There are no policies in place at PR agencies mandating that employees share their clients’ content (at least, not at reputable ones). Instead, the notion that “sharing is caring” has replaced much of the ethical hand-wringing of days past. We do it because it’s now part of the relationship nurturing process.

Some firms still disclose all client relationships in their social outreach, but often it’s more about trumpeting to the world who your clients are than about worrying about the appearance of impropriety.

One of my clients is Unitil Corporation, which provides natural gas and electricity in New England. Many of their tweets center on public safety messages, particularly during storms. I share their tweets regularly – without disclosing the fact that it’s a client. Why? Because my client’s message is truly adding value – timely information that could possibly even save a life.

There’s not a darned thing improper about that, and it’s almost effortless to do.

Frictionless caring.

 
 
Comments

One Response to Public Relations’ Little Secret: “Frictionless CARING”

  1. becky caudill (@bcaudill) says:

    I think tweeting/promoting a client simply for the sake of doing so is a slippery slope and something I’ve never felt truly comfortable with. For those whose Twitter handles are entirely an expression of their professional selves it’s an easier decision, but I have a lot of different types of people on my Twitter list and I can guarantee that the majority of them don’t care about 98% of the enterprise technology clients I rep’d in the past. When I first started working at my current gig I was asked to regularly tweet out pre-written messages about the company. Again, no one on my feed cares about these topics so I had to ask the person making the request, “if no one seeing this actually cares, how does this help you?” I’m not sure it’s enough to just have eyeballs on the tweet – there has to be the right audience and in my case, my friends never were. I think it’s a lot different though in the example you cite above – I’ve seen your tweets and it makes perfect sense (not so much if I were to tweet data deduplication stats, right?).

    I think what it comes down to is a little mantra I call upon in so many situations: “Don’t be dumb.” If it doesn’t make sense, and it’ll make you look foolish, don’t do it. :-)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>